Full Scale named to the Inc. 5000 for the 5th time
Software development outsourcing built around your team, not around our agency

Outsource the work. Keep the control.

Full Scale is a software development outsourcing company that gives U.S. teams full ownership of senior offshore engineers, with the hiring, payroll, benefits, and HR overhead handled for you. Our software development outsourcing services have placed 700+ engineers into SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and enterprise teams since 2018, and every developer on the bench is pre-vetted and senior, with a fully-loaded rate that starts at $35 an hour.

200+
U.S. teams outsourced with since 2018
93%
Annual developer retention
7 days
From discovery call to first commit
Full Scale outsourced software development team working with U.S. clients from our Cebu office
You own the code, always

The software development outsourcing company behind 5M+ hours of shipped code across 200+ U.S. teams

Matt Watson, Full Scale CEO, ran outsourced software development as a CTO before he sold it as a CEO
Matt Watson
Founder & CEO, Full Scale
Previously founded VinSolutions ($150M+ exit) and Stackify
A note from our founder

Most companies outsource the wrong things and keep the wrong things

I've watched a lot of companies outsource software development the wrong way. They keep the recruiting, the HR, and the payroll grind in-house, then they hand the roadmap, the architecture, and the code review to an agency and call it efficiency. Six months later they own a codebase they can't read, written by engineers they never met, and the agency has them on a renewal call.

Full Scale is a software development outsourcing company built around senior Filipino engineers and the Product Driven framework. The model is the inverse of the agency playbook. You outsource the drag, the parts that don't make your product better. We handle recruiting, payroll, benefits, equipment, office space, HR, and retention. You keep the parts that determine whether the product ships: the roadmap, the architecture, the standups, the code review, the priorities, and who's on your team.

I built our first outsourced engineering team at Stackify in 2018, and the model worked because the engineers were mine, not the agency's. They sat in my Slack threads, pushed to my repo, and reported to my engineering leadership. That model sold the company. It's the same model we run for AMC Theatres, LendingStandard, and 200+ other U.S. companies today.

Outsource the work. Keep the control. That's the whole model in one line.

4x
Tech founder
2018
First outsourced team at Stackify
200+
U.S. companies outsourced with since
What is software development outsourcing

Software development outsourcing is hiring engineers outside your company to build software inside your company. There's a right way and a wrong way to do it.

The clean definition: software development outsourcing is when you partner with an outside company to provide some or all of the engineers building your software. The outsourcing partner handles recruiting, payroll, benefits, HR, equipment, and retention. You handle the work itself, the roadmap, and the engineering direction. When it's done right, the engineers feel like your engineers and the partner stays invisible.

The reason this topic is so confusing is that two very different models both get called "outsourcing." The first model is the agency build: you hand a vendor a project, they go away for six months, and you get back a finished deliverable you didn't watch get built. The second model is the dedicated team: you outsource the hiring and the HR overhead, but the engineers join your team long-term and report into your engineering leadership.

Most software development outsourcing companies sell the first model because it has higher margin. Full Scale sells the second because it's the model that actually works for any company building a real product. Here's how the two compare, side by side.

Factor
Dedicated team outsourcing
Project-based outsourcing
What you're buying
A long-term engineer on your team
A finished deliverable from a vendor
Who owns the codebase
You. Always.
Often shared with or held by the vendor
Who runs the work
Your engineering leadership
The vendor's project manager
When priorities shift
The team pivots with your roadmap
You renegotiate the contract
Where the knowledge lives
Inside your team, on your wiki
Inside the vendor's heads
When the engagement ends
You keep the people and the code
You start over from a handoff doc

Project outsourcing is the right call when the work is bounded and you don't need a full-time person on it after launch. A one-time WordPress build, a payments integration, a data migration. Dedicated team outsourcing is the right call when the code outlives the contract, which is most of the time for any company building a real product. Full Scale only offers the dedicated team model, and that's a deliberate choice. We don't ship code we don't have to maintain.

The control framework

What you should outsource and what you should never outsource

Outsourcing software development goes wrong when companies give up the wrong things. The fix is a clean line between what to outsource and what to keep. Outsource the drag. Keep the leverage. The drag is the overhead nobody enjoys and nobody competes on. The leverage is the work that determines whether the product is any good.

Never outsource

Keep these in-house. Always.

The roadmap
What gets built, in what order, and why. Outsource this and you'll ship someone else's product.
Architecture decisions
Which database, which framework, which patterns. These outlive every engineer who touches them.
Code review standards
Your bar for what merges to main. If a vendor sets this, your codebase becomes their codebase.
Who's on your team
Interview every engineer yourself. A vendor's vetting is never the same as your vetting.
Sprint priorities
What gets worked on this week. Outsource priorities and the team drifts toward whatever is easiest to invoice.
The CI/CD pipeline
How code ships. If you don't own the pipeline, you don't really own the codebase.
The customer feedback loop
Who talks to users, what they hear, and what they bring back to the team. This loop builds the product.
Outsource this

Hand off the drag. All of it.

Recruiting
Sourcing, screening, technical interviews, reference checks. 3-6 months of slog that produces zero customer value.
Payroll
Pay cycles, tax filings, contractor classifications, multi-country compliance. None of this ships features.
Benefits
Health insurance, retirement plans, PTO administration. Important. Not engineering work.
Equipment
Laptops, monitors, peripherals, replacements, asset tracking, deprovisioning. Logistics, not leverage.
Office space
Leases, desks, internet, security cameras, the receptionist. All overhead, all the time.
HR operations
Performance documentation, conflict resolution, labor law compliance. A full-time role you don't want to staff.
Retention
Career paths, salary reviews, engagement surveys, exit interviews. Hard to do well even when it's your only job.

Outsource the work. Keep the control. That's the model Full Scale is built around, and it's why our engagements last for years instead of one bad contract.

Built different

Engineers trained on AI and Product Driven principles

The reason most outsourcing software development engagements stall is that the engineer placed on your team thinks like a contractor, not a product owner. They wait for tickets, write what they're told, and disappear when the sprint ends without leaving anything behind for the team.

Our engineers are trained to do the opposite. They're hired and developed inside a Product Driven framework, and they use modern AI tooling as part of their daily workflow. That combination is rare, and it's the difference between an outsourced developer who acts like your engineer and one who acts like a vendor's resource.

Pillar 1

Product Driven engineering

Engineers placed through our software development outsourcing services are trained on the five pillars from Matt's book: Vision, Focus, Clarity, Ownership, and Courage. The result is developers who push back on bad product decisions, ask whether a ticket should exist before writing it, and own the outcome of what ships. They join your team as real engineers, not as order takers waiting for the next handoff.

Read Product Driven, the book
Pillar 2

AI as a thinking partner

Every engineer on our bench works with GitHub Copilot, Claude, and Cursor every day. They use AI to explore options, scaffold the boring parts, generate test suites, and review their own pull requests before a human ever sees them. Judgment stays with the engineer, the grunt work moves to the machine.

Outsourcing software development works when the engineer on your team thinks like a product owner from week one. We hire and train for that, and the AI tooling is what makes it scale. Engineers who can think AND use AI well are rare, and that combination is what makes the difference inside a long-term outsourced engagement.

Matt Watson, Founder & CEO, Full Scale
Featured case study

The engineering team behind AMC Theatres

AMC Theatres
Fortune 500 client
Industry
Media & Entertainment
Engagement
Fully integrated team
Footprint
900+ theatres worldwide
Derrick Leggett, CIO of AMC Theatres: It's a fully integrated team. It's just some of the people happen to be living in the Philippines.
Software development outsourcing pricing

Outsourced engineers, starting at $35 an hour

That rate is fully loaded: it covers a senior engineer working full-time on your project, with payroll, benefits, HR, and equipment all handled by us. The same role hired locally in the U.S. costs $150K to $195K a year, and that's before recruiter fees, benefits overhead, and the three-month ramp. The math is what drives most of our clients to call, but the model is what keeps them here.

Starting at
$35/ hour
Per outsourced developer, fully loaded
Compared to U.S. based hires
Roughly 40-50% of an equivalent U.S. hire

Final rate depends on seniority and skill specialty.

What you get for that rate
  • Full-time engineer assigned exclusively to your project
  • Pre-vetted by senior engineering reviewers on our side
  • Works your hours, your tools, your codebase
  • Payroll, HR, equipment, and benefits handled by us
  • U.S.-based customer success manager you can escalate to
  • Two-week money-back guarantee if it isn't a fit
Trusted operator

Full Scale has made the Inc. 5000 five years in a row and is Great Place to Work certified. We've been running software development outsourcing services for U.S. companies since 2018, so the operator-level details of payroll, retention, and replacement are already worked out. Pricing is the easiest reason to call, but the model is the reason clients stay.

Why most software development outsourcing fails

The horror stories aren't about offshore talent. They're about agency models built around the agency, not the client.

The way most outsourcing software development companies are structured creates predictable failure modes. The engineers aren't the problem. The contract structure, the staffing rotation, and the incentive to upsell maintenance are the problem. These are the six patterns we built our model to avoid, and the questions to ask any outsourcing partner before you sign a contract.

The rate-card game

The agency baits you with a junior rate, sells you a junior developer, and the work that ships is junior work. Six months in, you're paying for senior and shipping for intern. The fix: vet seniority yourself in the interview round. Full Scale sends real engineers with real project history to your interview, and you pass on anyone who isn't ready.

The mid-project handoff

Your kickoff team is the agency's A-team. By week four they've rotated off to the next sale and your project gets the bench. You discover this in standup, when a new face shows up and asks for the brief. The fix: the engineers you interview are the engineers you keep, full-time, for the life of the engagement, with no silent swaps onto your account.

The we'll-fix-it-in-maintenance close

The vendor lowballs the build to win the bid, then prices the back end of the contract assuming you'll need them for maintenance you didn't agree to. By the time the missing features surface, you're past the point of switching. The fix: flat-rate per-engineer monthly pricing with no maintenance back-end. You pay for the engineer, not for the project.

The agency churn loop

Most offshore agencies run 30-50% annual turnover. The engineer who learned your codebase in month one is gone by month nine. The next engineer rebuilds context from a wiki nobody updated. The fix: 93%+ annual retention. Engineers get competitive pay, real career paths, and a customer success manager who fights for them when something gets weird with a client.

The language gap dressed up as a time-zone gap

When you can't fully understand the engineer's English, you can't push back on a bad architecture call, you can't critique a sloppy PR, and you stop reviewing the code because every review takes 40 minutes. The fix: every Full Scale engineer is fluent in English and works U.S. business hours. The whole point of outsourcing software development is to extend your team, not to add a translation layer.

The unowned codebase

The vendor owns the repo, the tests, the deployment pipeline, the secrets, and the database backups. The day you decide to leave, you start over. The fix: you own everything. The repo lives in your GitHub org, the CI/CD runs on your accounts, and on day one of every engagement the engineers are pushing into infrastructure you control. If we disappeared tomorrow, you'd keep shipping.

How the engagement is structured

Three ways to outsource software development with Full Scale

Most clients start by outsourcing one engineer and grow into a full team. Every model below puts full-time developers on your standups, working your hours, shipping code against your roadmap. These aren't freelancers, they aren't shared between clients, and they aren't sitting at a project shop on the side. We don't do project-based outsourcing at all, because that's the model that creates the horror stories. The alternative is straightforward: dedicated software developers embedded in your team for the long haul.

Single dedicated developer

You outsource one full-time engineer who works exclusively on your project and embeds with your team.

Best for
Long-running products where you need to add one or two senior engineers to an existing team without expanding into a full pod.
What's included
  • Full-time engineer assigned only to your project
  • Works your hours, your tools, your codebase
  • Joins your standups, reports to your tech lead
  • We handle payroll, HR, equipment, and retention
  • Two-week money-back guarantee

Dedicated outsourced team

You outsource a full pod of engineers and we run it as a unit embedded with your product.

Best for
Greenfield builds, new product lines, or when you need to spin up a real engineering pod without doing it in-house.
What's included
  • Full pod sized to your roadmap (typically tech lead + engineers + QA)
  • Embedded with your product and design teams
  • Customer success manager runs the offshore-employer side
  • We handle payroll, HR, equipment, and retention across the pod
  • Scale up or down by a head with 30 days notice

Hybrid team outsourcing

We run your U.S. team and a Full Scale pod together as one engineering org.

Best for
Companies with existing local engineers who want to extend velocity without losing the local team's institutional knowledge.
What's included
  • U.S. leads pair with Full Scale engineers during the first 60 days
  • One shared definition of done across both sides
  • Time-zone overlap designed for your working window
  • Quarterly performance reviews with your engineering management
  • Same employment and IP protection as the other engagement models
Geography

What's the best country to outsource software development?

Four regions handle most U.S. software development outsourcing today. Each one has real trade-offs, and the right answer depends on what you're optimizing for: cost, English fluency, time-zone overlap, or talent depth. Here's an honest breakdown of the options before we tell you why Full Scale picked the Philippines.

Philippines

Why we hire here
Hourly rate
$35-65/hr
English
Native-level
U.S. overlap
Full U.S. overlap available
Education
U.S.-style CS curriculum

Native English fluency, U.S.-style engineering education, and engineers who work U.S. business hours by design. The math works without quality compromise. Full Scale hires exclusively from the Philippines because the combination of these four variables is hard to find anywhere else.

India

Lowest rate
Hourly rate
$20-40/hr
English
Strong, but accented
U.S. overlap
Limited U.S. overlap
Education
Deep CS pipeline

The largest outsourcing market and the cheapest hourly rate. The trade-offs are well-documented: quality varies widely across the talent pool, communication friction is real when accents are heavy, and the 10-12 hour time difference means most work happens asynchronously. Works for some buyers, not others.

Eastern Europe

Closest to East Coast
Hourly rate
$40-75/hr
English
Strong
U.S. overlap
Half-day U.S. overlap (East Coast)
Education
Strong technical universities

Poland, Ukraine, Romania, and Hungary all have strong technical talent and good English. The working window overlaps East Coast U.S. for about half the day, which is fine for most engagements. Rates have climbed significantly since 2020. Geopolitical risk in some markets is now a real consideration.

Latin America

Closest to West Coast
Hourly rate
$45-80/hr
English
Strong
U.S. overlap
Full U.S. overlap
Education
Mixed quality

Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, and Colombia all offer full time-zone overlap with U.S. business hours, which is the strongest case for the region. Rates have risen sharply as Silicon Valley companies have built out LatAm teams. Quality varies more by country than the regional average suggests.

Why Full Scale only outsources from the Philippines

We hire exclusively from Cebu and Manila because the Philippines is the only market that lets us deliver senior engineers with native-level English, U.S.-style technical training, and same-day collaboration with U.S. teams, at a rate that still makes outsourcing worth doing. We've watched plenty of clients try multi-country bench strategies and end up consolidating onto one market anyway. We just skip the detour.

From discovery call to first commit in as little as 7 days

How an outsourced software development team actually starts

Our bench of 350+ engineers is already built and vetted through our four-stage process, so we're matching from a pool that's ready instead of running a 3-6 week recruitment cycle from cold. Every step below is real, and every step has a named owner on our side.

01

Discovery call

Day 1

30 minutes with our team. We learn your stack, your roadmap, the seniority level you need, and the kind of work the outsourced engineer will be doing in the first 90 days. There's no sales pitch on the call, just a working conversation about what you need.

02

Engineer match

Days 2-3

We pull 1-3 pre-vetted engineers from the bench whose skills, seniority, and prior project experience line up with what you described. You see their full profile and their actual project history before you ever talk to them.

03

Technical interview

Days 3-5

You interview the candidates the way you would interview any senior hire: live coding, system design, and the gotchas that matter for your stack. Pass on anyone you don't believe in, and we keep looking. You're outsourcing the recruiting work, not the hiring decision.

04

Contract & onboarding

Days 5-6

Sign once. We handle every contract, payroll, equipment, and HR detail in the Philippines, so you don't have an offshore entity to manage. The MSA includes IP assignment, NDA terms, and background verification on the outsourced engineer.

05

First commit

Day 7

Your developer joins your standups, gets repo access on your GitHub org, and ships code in their first week. We pair them with a U.S. engineer on your team for the first 60 days so context isn't trapped in one person's head.

How Full Scale compares

Full Scale vs. other software development outsourcing companies and the in-house alternative.

Every outsourcing path has trade-offs. The rows below are the ones that actually matter when you're trying to outsource without giving up control of your product. Here's how a Full Scale engagement compares against the alternatives most teams consider first.

FeatureFull ScaleFreelancer / UpworkTraditional outsourcing agencyU.S. recruiter / FTE hire
You own the repo and CI/CD on day one
You interview every engineer yourself
Time to first commit7 days1-3 days3-6 weeks6-12 weeks
Dedicated full-time, not shared between clients
Engineer reports to your engineering leadership
Long-term retention93%+low30-50%varies
Two-week money-back guarantee
Payroll, HR, equipment, IP handled by partner
U.S.-based customer success manager
n/a
Typical fully-loaded cost vs U.S.~40-50%varies~50-65%100%
The bench

Real software engineers, named and vetted

A sample of the software engineers on our team. These are real Full Scale developers working remotely from across the Philippines, and you'll meet candidates like them during your interview round.

Ray A., Senior Software Developer at Full Scale
Ray A.
Senior Software Developer
Cebu, Philippines 10 years

A senior software developer with 10 years of experience across ASP.NET, C#, and .NET.

ASP.NETC#.NET.NET CorePHPJavaJavaScriptPython
Nestor D., Software Developer at Full Scale
Nestor D.
Software Developer
Cebu, Philippines 3 years

A software developer building with React, Vue.js, and JavaScript.

ReactVue.jsJavaScriptASP.NETPythonC#Django
Lovely B., Software Developer at Full Scale
Lovely B.
Software Developer
Cebu, Philippines 5 years

A software developer who ships production work with React, CSS, and JavaScript.

ReactCSSJavaScriptJavaNode.jsMySQLSpring Boot
David M., Senior Software Developer at Full Scale
David M.
Senior Software Developer
Cebu, Philippines 12 years

A senior software developer with 12 years of experience across Android, Android Java, and iOS.

AndroidAndroid JavaiOSKotlinReact NativeSwiftIonicSwiftUI
Clarice L., Software Developer at Full Scale
Clarice L.
Software Developer
Bohol, Philippines 5 years

A software developer who ships production work with JavaScript, TypeScript, and C#.

JavaScriptTypeScriptC#C++SpringAPI Development
Kirk H., Software Developer at Full Scale
Kirk H.
Software Developer
Aklan, Philippines 8 years

A software developer who ships production work with React, Bootstrap, and JavaScript.

ReactBootstrapJavaScriptTypeScriptAndroidAndroid JavaC#Cucumber
Why top U.S. engineering teams pick Full Scale

The numbers behind a software development outsourcing company that actually works

350+
Engineers on staff
available to outsource onto your team
93%
Yearly retention
your team stays your team
7 days
To first commit
from discovery call to shipping
200+
U.S. companies outsourced with
SaaS, fintech, healthcare, enterprise
5M+
Development hours
delivered through outsourced engagements
2018
First outsourced team
the year Matt built ours at Stackify
What clients say

From the U.S. teams who outsourced with us and stayed

The team at Full Scale brought our vision to life with their impeccable development skills. They helped us navigate technical requirements with ease, resulting in a robust platform that our users trust.

Nomi Smith
Nomi Smith
PMI Rate Pro
Read the PMI Rate Pro case study

Full Scale's developers were instrumental in revolutionizing our health management systems. Their ability to seamlessly integrate advanced features and data security has set a standard for our software solutions.

Glenn Fisher
Glenn Fisher
NavMD
Read the NavMD case study
Frequently asked

Everything you wanted to know about outsourcing software development

Software development outsourcing services that start this week

Ready to outsource without losing control?

30-minute discovery call with our team. We'll learn what you're building, walk you through who's on the bench right now, and you'll meet candidates within a week. You own the engineer, you own the codebase, you own the roadmap. We handle the rest.

First commit in as little as 7 days
Two-week money-back guarantee
You own the team and the code