Remote Meeting Optimization: How Top Tech Teams Cut Meeting Time by 50%

Technical teams lose an average of 23 hours per week to meetings, resulting in a staggering $283 billion in lost productivity annually across the tech sector. 

Effective remote meeting optimization represents the single most impactful efficiency intervention available to technical leaders today.

This epidemic of meeting overload particularly impacts distributed engineering teams, where collaboration across time zones often multiplies coordination touchpoints. 

High-performing technical organizations are now implementing structured remote meeting optimization strategies to reclaim up to 50% of this lost time.

Recent research from 2024-2025 highlights the growing urgency for remote meeting optimization in technical organizations:

• Software engineers now spend 47% more time in meetings than in 2020 (McKinsey’s State of Engineering Productivity Report, 2025)
• Remote developers experience 23% higher meeting loads than their in-office counterparts (Harvard Business Review, 2024)
• Engineering teams implementing remote meeting optimization frameworks report 42% higher sprint velocity (StackOverflow Developer Survey, 2024)
• CIOs identify excessive meetings as their #1 productivity challenge, ahead of technical debt (Gartner CIO Survey, 2025)

This approach works specifically for technical teams because it leverages the engineering mindset—applying systematic process improvement to communication workflows. 

By treating meetings as a resource to be optimized rather than an inevitable burden, CTOs, and engineering leaders are freeing their teams to deliver exceptional results.

The Real Cost of Meeting Overload for Technical Teams

The burden of excessive meetings extends far beyond the hours spent in the conference room or Zoom call. 

Effective remote meeting optimization begins with understanding these true costs. Without accurate measurement, technical teams cannot prioritize communication efficiency improvements.

Quantifiable Metrics

The following metrics reveal the hidden burden of meeting overload on engineering productivity. 

These data points help CTOs build a business case for remote meeting optimization initiatives. Quantifying these costs provides the baseline against which improvement can be measured.

This table quantifies the direct costs of excessive meetings for technical teams. 

Each metric represents a dimension of productivity loss that remote meeting optimization can address. Consider these figures when calculating your team’s meeting ROI.

The financial implications become evident when we consider both direct costs and opportunity costs. Each hour spent in an unnecessary meeting represents code that isn’t written, bugs that aren’t fixed, and features that aren’t shipped.

Context Switching Impact

Engineers experience uniquely high context-switching costs when pulled from deep work into meetings. 

Developer context switching creates substantial hidden productivity losses beyond the meeting time itself. 

According to research from the University of California, a developer needs approximately 23 minutes to regain flow state after an interruption. 

This cognitive load drains mental resources and increases error rates in complex technical tasks.

Engineering-Specific Meeting Burden

Technical teams face a particular meeting ecosystem that includes:

• Daily standups (5 hours/week)
• Sprint planning (2-4 hours/biweekly)
• Backlog refinement (2-3 hours/week)
• Retrospectives (1-2 hours/biweekly)
• Technical design reviews (variable)
• Demo days (1-2 hours/biweekly)
• Cross-team coordination (5+ hours/week)

These meetings, while individually justified, collectively consume up to 40% of an engineer’s productive time.

Case Example: Before/After Metrics

This case study demonstrates the quantifiable impact of implementing remote meeting optimization frameworks. 

Fintech startup Paymento transformed its communication practices with measurable results. Their systematic approach provides a template for engineering organizations of any size.

The following table shows Paymento’s transformation through remote meeting optimization strategies. Their results represent typical outcomes when implementing a comprehensive optimization framework. 

Note how sprint velocity improvement correlates with reduced context switching.

This transformation enabled Paymento to deliver a significant product update two months before schedule.

The 50% Meeting Reduction Framework for Remote Meeting Optimization

Successful meeting reduction requires a systematic approach. This section outlines a proven remote meeting optimization framework for technical teams. This structured methodology has delivered consistent results across organizations of various sizes.

Audit Phase: Categorizing and Measuring

The audit phase creates visibility into your current meeting ecosystem. This critical first step establishes your baseline for improvement. Accurate measurement provides the foundation for all subsequent optimization steps.

Begin by creating a comprehensive meeting inventory. Document every recurring meeting and categorize each by:

1. Purpose (decision-making, information sharing, coordination, problem-solving)
2. Required participants
3. Actual value delivered
4. Time invested (including preparation and follow-up)

This baseline assessment reveals the true meeting load across your engineering organization.

Elimination Criteria: Decision Tree

The following decision framework helps identify meetings that can be eliminated or transformed. This systematic evaluation process applies engineering logic to communication workflows. Use this decision tree with your entire technical team for consistent evaluation.

Is this meeting primarily for:

├── Information distribution → Can it be documented instead?

│   ├── Yes → Replace with documentation

│   └── No → Continue evaluation

├── Status updates → Can it be done asynchronously?

│   ├── Yes → Replace with async updates

│   └── No → Continue evaluation

├── Decision making → Do all participants need to decide together?

│   ├── No → Reduce participant list

│   └── Yes → Optimize format

└── Problem solving → Does it require real-time collaboration?

    ├── No → Use async collaboration tools

    └── Yes → Keep but optimize format and frequency

This structured evaluation typically identifies 30-40% of meetings that can be eliminated entirely.

Conversion Strategy: Synchronous to Asynchronous

Transform necessary information-sharing meetings into asynchronous formats. Effective distributed team coordination requires thoughtful conversion rather than simple elimination. 

The following table outlines proven conversion paths for different meeting types.

This conversion matrix helps technical teams identify appropriate asynchronous alternatives for common meeting types. 

Each row represents a meeting that can be transformed through remote meeting optimization principles. The suggested tools support these conversions with minimal friction.

Transition gradually by converting one meeting type per week to avoid disruption.

Optimization Approach: Improving Necessary Meetings

Some meetings remain essential for technical teams. Not all communication can be asynchronous, especially for complex problem-solving. 

These optimization techniques focus on making remaining meetings maximally effective.

Implement these CTO meeting strategy elements for necessary synchronous sessions:

• Clear agendas sent 24+ hours in advance
• Precise timeboxing per agenda item
• Defined decision-making frameworks
• Required pre-reading materials
• Documented outcomes and action items
• Meeting-free days for deep work

These optimizations reduce average meeting duration by 30% while improving outcomes. The deep work benefits are particularly significant for complex technical tasks.

Implementation Strategy for Remote Meeting Optimization

Effective implementation requires a nuanced understanding of different meeting types and their alternatives. This section outlines practical steps for adopting remote meeting optimization methodologies. 

The strategies here can be customized for your team’s specific context.

Meeting Typology for Technical Teams

Technical teams engage in four primary meeting categories, each requiring different optimization approaches. 

This typology helps identify appropriate transformation strategies for each meeting type. Engineering teams should evaluate their meeting ecosystem against these categories.

Decision-making Meetings

These gatherings establish direction on architecture, feature prioritization, or technical approaches. They require careful preparation but often yield high value.

This table demonstrates how to transform decision-making meetings through remote meeting optimization techniques. Each row represents a common meeting type transformed through a more efficient protocol. 

These approaches maintain decision quality while reducing time investment.

Information-sharing Sessions

Information dissemination represents the most replaceable meeting type for technical teams. These meetings have the highest optimization potential through remote meeting optimization. 

Converting these to asynchronous formats delivers immediate time savings.

This table presents information-sharing meetings and their asynchronous alternatives. These transformations support documentation-driven development practices. 

Each alternative preserves the information value while eliminating synchronous overhead.

Coordination Touchpoints

These brief alignment points prevent work conflicts and dependencies. Coordination touchpoints require special attention in distributed team coordination. 

These meetings typically have high frequency but should have short durations.

The coordination optimization table shows how to transform alignment meetings for distributed teams. Remote standup optimization focuses on asynchronous updates with exception handling. 

These approaches maintain team synchronization while minimizing meeting time.

Problem-solving Collaborations

Real-time collaboration on complex technical challenges often delivers high value. 

Problem-solving sessions benefit from synchronous interaction but need careful structuring. When properly optimized, these meetings support deep engineering collaboration.

This optimization matrix presents approaches for high-value collaborative problem-solving. 

These techniques support DevOps collaboration without excessive meetings. The focus remains on structured interaction with clear deliverables.

Async Alternatives for Each Meeting Type

The following table provides specific asynchronous alternatives for common technical team meetings. 

These approaches form the core of agile team communication efficiency. Each alternative maintains the meeting’s purpose while eliminating synchronous overhead.

This comprehensive transformation table shows meeting alternatives for various engineering activities. These timezone-friendly collaboration methods work effectively across distributed teams. 

Each approach supports sprint velocity improvement while reducing synchronous overhead.

Each alternative preserves the value while reducing the time investment.

Essential vs. Non-essential Determination Process

Technical teams must develop clear criteria for determining which meetings remain essential. 

This determination process applies minimalist meeting protocols for developers. The following criteria help distinguish truly necessary meetings from those that can be transformed.

1. Does the meeting deliver a decision that blocks multiple team members?
2. Does the topic require real-time discussion to reach a consensus?
3. Is the subject complex enough that asynchronous discussion would be inefficient?
4. Are there emotional or interpersonal factors that benefit from face-to-face interaction?

Meetings satisfying at least two criteria should remain but be optimized. Others become candidates for elimination or conversion.

Technical Tools and Systems for Remote Meeting Optimization

Successful remote meeting optimization relies on appropriate tooling to support asynchronous workflows. This section outlines the essential technology infrastructure needed to support reduced meeting loads. 

These tools enable effective communication without synchronous overhead.

Documentation-driven Alternatives

Documentation-driven development forms the backbone of successful meeting reduction. This approach prioritizes written artifacts over verbal explanations. The following documentation types enable asynchronous workflows.

Documentation becomes the backbone of reduced-meeting cultures.

This documentation matrix shows the essential written artifacts that replace meetings in technical organizations. 

Each type serves a specific purpose in remote meeting optimization strategies. Implementing these documentation types creates a comprehensive knowledge system that reduces meeting dependency.

Effective documentation requires consistent structure and discoverability. Templates and categorization systems prevent information fragmentation.

Tooling Recommendations and Integration Points

The right toolset creates a seamless asynchronous workflow. Meeting efficiency software development requires integrated systems that work harmoniously. 

These tools form the technical foundation for remote meeting optimization.

An integrated toolchain supports asynchronous communication through:

1. Project management system (Jira, Monday, Asana)
2. Documentation platform (Confluence, Notion)
3. Communication hub (Slack, Teams)
4. Video recording tool (Loom, Zoom)
5. Code review system (GitHub, GitLab)
6. Decision documentation framework (RFC system)

Integration between these tools maximizes effectiveness. Automate notifications when documentation changes or decisions require input. A comprehensive meeting cost calculator for technical teams should factor in these implementation costs.

Notification and Communication Protocols

Establish clear communication norms to prevent information overload. Software development communication efficiency depends on well-defined channels and expectations. 

These protocols define how information flows in an asynchronous environment.

This communication protocol matrix defines appropriate channels and response expectations. Clear guidelines prevent communication overload while ensuring important information flows effectively. 

These protocols enable asynchronous status updates for engineering teams without synchronous meetings.

These protocols prevent the common pitfall of asynchronous work—communication sprawl.

Knowledge Repository Architecture

Design your knowledge management system to support reduced meeting loads. 

Remote meeting optimization depends on effective knowledge management. Your information architecture should prioritize accessibility and discoverability.

Engineering knowledge-sharing alternatives require structured repositories with the following:

1. Single source of truth for each information type
2. Clear ownership for each documentation area
3. Search functionality across all platforms
4. Regular archiving of outdated information
5. Version history for all important documents
6. Notification system for relevant updates

This structure ensures information remains discoverable without requiring synchronous explanation. 

Technical documentation alternatives serve as the backbone of asynchronous communication.

Change Management for Remote Meeting Optimization

Technical teams require specialized change management approaches focused on data and developer experience. 

Implementing remote meeting optimization requires thoughtful transition planning. These strategies help teams adopt new communication patterns without disruption.

Developer-centric Adoption Strategies

Engineers respond best to changes that align with their working preferences. 

Deep work for software engineers should be protected and prioritized through these approaches. Developer time management improves when teams adopt these strategies.

Successful remote meeting optimization for developers prioritizes:

1. Demonstrable improvement to their workflow
2. Minimal arbitrary process overhead
3. Flexibility for different working styles
4. Clear guidance without excessive rules

Frame meeting reduction as an engineering problem to be solved rather than a management initiative. Invite developers to participate in designing the new communication architecture.

Measuring Success Metrics

Monitor these key indicators during implementation. Remote meeting optimization requires quantifiable metrics to demonstrate success. 

These measurements provide objective evidence of improvement to sustain momentum.

This metrics table provides a comprehensive measurement framework for remote meeting optimization initiatives. These indicators help track progress across multiple dimensions. 

The balanced approach ensures quality doesn’t suffer as meeting time decreases.

These metrics ensure that meeting reduction delivers real productivity improvements without sacrificing quality.

Common Resistance Points and Solutions

Technical teams may express concerns about meeting reduction strategies. Every remote meeting optimization initiative faces resistance based on legitimate concerns. 

Addressing these proactively increases adoption success.

This table addresses common concerns about remote meeting optimization initiatives. Each row presents a resistance point with a structured solution. 

Proactive resolution of these concerns increases adoption success across technical teams.

Acknowledge these concerns while providing concrete solutions to address each.

Timeline and Implementation Phases for Remote Meeting Optimization

Implement these changes gradually across four phases. Phased implementation prevents disruption while teams adapt to new communication patterns. 

This measured approach ensures the successful adoption of remote meeting optimization.

Phase 1: Assessment and Planning (2-4 weeks)

• Meeting audit and categorization
• Tool selection and configuration
• Communication protocol design
• Team training on new workflows

Phase 2: Initial Implementation (4-6 weeks)

• Convert 25% of meetings to asynchronous format
• Establish documentation templates
• Test notification systems
• Collect initial feedback

Phase 3: Expansion (6-8 weeks)

• Extend to 50% meeting reduction
• Refine asynchronous workflows
• Implement measurement systems
• Adjust based on team feedback

Phase 4: Optimization (Ongoing)

• Regular meeting inventory review
• Documentation quality assessment
• Continuous improvement processes
• Onboarding new team members to protocols

This phased approach prevents productivity disruption while implementing change.

Case Studies in Remote Meeting Optimization

Real-world examples demonstrate the practical application of meeting reduction strategies. These case studies show remote meeting optimization in various contexts. 

Each organization followed similar principles but adapted them to their specific environment.

Mid-size SaaS Company Implementation

Company Profile: CloudMetrics, 85 engineers across 4 teams

Challenge: Engineers spending 18+ hours weekly in meetings

Approach:

1. Mapped all recurring meetings and their purposes
2. Converted daily standups to asynchronous updates
3. Implemented RFC system for architecture decisions
4. Created dedicated “maker days” without meetings
5. Established documentation templates for knowledge sharing

Results:

• Meeting time reduced to 8.5 hours per week per engineer
• Code deployment frequency increased by 32%
• Employee satisfaction scores improved from 67% to 89%
• Time to market for new features decreased by 28%

Key Learning: Documentation quality is directly correlated with meeting reduction success.

Enterprise Development Team Transformation

This enterprise case demonstrates remote meeting optimization at scale. Large organizations face unique challenges with cross-team coordination. This financial services firm successfully implemented comprehensive meeting reduction strategies.

Company Profile: Financial services firm, 240 developers across 16 teams

Challenge: Cross-team coordination consumes 40% of engineering time

Approach:

1. Created API contract documentation system
2. Implemented team ambassador model for cross-team coordination
3. Established clear decision frameworks with delegation thresholds
4. Converted status reporting to automated dashboards
5. Developed tiered escalation protocols for blockers

Results:

• Meeting load reduced by 47%
• Cross-team dependencies resolved 58% faster
• Regulatory compliance documentation improved by 64%
• Annual productivity gain valued at $4.2M

Key Learning: Enterprise scale required more structured governance of asynchronous processes.

Remote-first Startup Approach

This startup case study highlights timezone-friendly collaboration methods. Distributed teams face unique challenges that remote meeting optimization can address. Their approach demonstrates how a meeting-free development culture benefits global teams.

Company Profile: DevSecOps platform startup, 35 engineers across 12 time zones 

Challenge: Maintaining alignment with minimal synchronous overlap

Approach:

1. Implemented comprehensive documentation-first culture
2. Created 24-hour decision cycles with clear ownership
3. Developed asynchronous planning process
4. Established rotating facilitation for essential synchronous touchpoints
5. Built dedicated social connection channels

Results:

• Teams operated effectively with just 4 hours of meetings weekly
• Product shipped ahead of schedule despite time zone challenges
• Talent retention improved by 34% compared to the industry average
• Documentation quality rated in the top percentile by external assessment

Key Learning: Remote-first teams can achieve higher productivity by embracing asynchronous workflows from inception.

Maintaining Team Alignment Through Remote Meeting Optimization

Reducing meetings presents challenges for maintaining team cohesion. Effective remote meeting optimization preserves alignment while eliminating waste. 

These strategies help teams stay connected through primarily asynchronous collaboration.

Critical Synchronization Points to Preserve

Some synchronous touchpoints deliver unique values that asynchronous alternatives cannot match. These essential meetings remain even after aggressive remote meeting optimization. 

Preserve these high-value touchpoints while eliminating lower-value meetings.

This table outlines the essential synchronous touchpoints to maintain. These meetings deliver unique value that remote meeting optimization preserves. 

Technical team synchronization methods focus on these high-value interactions while eliminating lower-value meetings.

These essential touchpoints maintain team effectiveness while eliminating lower-value meetings.

Balancing Async Work with Necessary Face Time in Remote Meeting Optimization

Technical teams benefit from a structured balance between focus time and collaboration. Remote meeting optimization requires thoughtful scheduling patterns. 

This weekly rhythm preserves deep work while maintaining necessary coordination.

This weekly schedule template balances focused work and necessary collaboration. The structure provides predictable deep work periods for software engineers. 

This approach optimizes both individual productivity and team alignment.

This structured approach provides predictability while protecting focus time.

Cultural Elements that Support Remote Meeting Optimization

Culture plays a crucial role in successful meeting reduction. A meeting-free development culture requires supportive norms and practices. These cultural elements reinforce remote meeting optimization practices.

1. Documentation as a first-class deliverable
2. Respect for focus time blocks
3. Preparation expected before synchronous moments
4. Clear decision ownership and delegation
5. Default to asynchronous communication unless real-time is necessary
6. Inclusion through transparent documentation rather than meeting attendance

These cultural elements reinforce the systems and tools implemented for meeting reduction.

Communication Protocols that Prevent Information Silos

Reduced meetings can lead to information fragmentation without proper protocols. Remote team alignment techniques prevent knowledge isolation. 

These structured communication approaches maintain transparency without meetings.

This information distribution matrix outlines how different types of content should flow. These protocols ensure transparent communication without meeting overhead. 

Each approach maintains information flow while eliminating unnecessary synchronous touchpoints.

These protocols ensure information flows appropriately despite reduced synchronous touchpoints.

The Future of Work: Remote Meeting Optimization as Competitive Advantage

Engineering teams that successfully implement remote meeting optimization unlock substantial productivity gains while improving work satisfaction. 

The implementation process requires a commitment to documentation excellence, appropriate tooling, clear communication protocols, and cultural reinforcement. 

These approaches greatly benefit Scrum meeting optimization and agile team communication efficiency. However, the benefits extend beyond simple time savings.

Teams that master asynchronous collaboration gain competitive advantages in talent attraction, global team operations, and overall delivery speed. 

They create environments where deep technical work flourishes alongside effective collaboration. 

Code review alternatives to meetings enable higher-quality feedback while preserving focus time.

The future of technical team collaboration lies not in more meetings but in more thoughtful communication architecture.

Expected Outcomes from Remote Meeting Optimization

Organizations implementing these approaches can expect measurable improvements across multiple dimensions. These metrics demonstrate the full impact of remote meeting optimization. 

Each outcome contributes to overall engineering team effectiveness.

• 40-50% reduction in meeting hours
• 25-35% increase in sprint velocity
• 15-25% improvement in time-to-market
• 30-40% enhancement in developer satisfaction
• 20-30% reduction in context switching

These improvements translate to significant competitive advantages in talent retention, product quality, and market responsiveness.

Next Steps for Remote Meeting Optimization Implementation

Begin your meeting optimization journey with these concrete steps. These practical actions initiate your remote meeting optimization initiative. Each step builds on the previous one to create sustainable change.

1. Conduct a two-week meeting audit across your engineering organization
2. Calculate the current meeting cost using the formulas provided
3. Identify your highest-impact conversion opportunities
4. Select appropriate tools for your asynchronous workflow
5. Design your communication protocols
6. Implement changes in a phased approach
7. Measure outcomes against your baseline

Each organization’s path will vary, but the principles remain consistent across technical teams of all sizes.

Streamline Your Remote Engineering Workflow with Full Scale

Optimizing remote meetings is just one aspect of building high-performing distributed technical teams. 

At Full Scale, we specialize in helping businesses establish and manage offshore development teams equipped with the processes and tools to maximize productivity through effective remote meeting optimization.

Why Full Scale?

• Expert Development Teams: Our skilled developers bring extensive experience in distributed collaboration and lean communication practices.
• Software Development Services: We provide comprehensive development solutions that incorporate remote meeting optimization and efficient communication protocols.
• Software Testing Services: Our QA teams work seamlessly with developers using asynchronous workflows that minimize meeting overhead.
• App Development Services: Mobile and web application development with streamlined communication processes and efficient team coordination.
• Staff Augmentation Services: Flexibly scale your team with pre-trained engineers who understand effective remote collaboration.
• Seamless Integration: Our teams integrate effortlessly with your existing workflow, implementing optimized communication protocols from day one.
• Process Optimization: We help implement meeting reduction frameworks tailored to your specific technical organization.
• Increased Velocity: Focus on strategic goals while our teams maintain high productivity with minimal meeting overhead.

Don’t let excessive meetings drain your engineering resources. Schedule a free consultation today to learn how Full Scale can help your distributed team reclaim valuable development time through proven remote meeting optimization techniques.

Get Your Engineering Time Back

FAQs: Remote Meeting Optimization

How quickly can we expect productivity improvements after implementing remote meeting optimization?

Most technical teams see measurable improvements within 2-4 weeks of implementation. The initial gains typically come from eliminating redundant meetings, which can reclaim 15-20% of meeting time immediately. More substantial benefits emerge after 6-8 weeks as teams adapt to asynchronous workflows and documentation practices mature. Organizations that fully commit to the framework typically achieve the full 50% meeting reduction within 3-4 months.

Won’t reducing meetings create communication gaps in our engineering team?

When implemented correctly, remote meeting optimization replaces synchronous communication with more effective asynchronous alternatives rather than eliminating communication. Most teams report improved information flow after implementation since documentation creates a persistent, searchable knowledge base that’s accessible to everyone. The key is creating robust documentation practices and clear communication protocols for different types of information.

How do we handle team members who resist the transition to fewer meetings?

Resistance typically stems from valid concerns about missing information or losing social connection. The most effective approach is directly involving resistant team members in designing the new communication architecture. Make them responsible for creating aspects of the system that address their concerns. Also, some structured social touchpoints should be maintained to preserve team cohesion, and a gradual implementation should be considered that demonstrates success with a subset of meetings before expanding.

Do I need special tools or software to implement remote meeting optimization?

While you don’t need to purchase new software for meeting reduction, having the right tooling ecosystem helps significantly. Most technical organizations already have the essential components: a project management system, documentation platform, communication hub, and code management tools. The key is integrating these tools effectively and establishing transparent workflows between them. Focus on optimizing the tools you already have before investing in new solutions.

How do we prevent decision-making from slowing down with fewer synchronous meetings?

Efficient decision-making in a low-meeting environment relies on clear ownership and transparent processes. Implement a decision framework that specifies what decisions can be made autonomously, what requires consultation, and what needs broader approval. Document decision criteria for common scenarios and establish lightweight escalation paths for exceptions. Well-designed asynchronous decision processes can accelerate decision-making by eliminating scheduling delays.

How should we modify our remote meeting optimization approach for globally distributed teams across multiple time zones?

Distributed teams across time zones benefit most dramatically from meeting reduction. Prioritize comprehensive documentation and asynchronous updates with minimal overlap requirements. Designate clear handoff protocols between regions to maintain continuous progress. For necessary synchronous moments, implement a rotation schedule that shares the burden of inconvenient meeting times equitably across regions. Consider establishing a 24-hour decision cycle with clear delegation for urgent matters.

Matt Watson

Matt Watson is a serial tech entrepreneur who has started four companies and had a nine-figure exit. He was the founder and CTO of VinSolutions, the #1 CRM software used in today’s automotive industry. He has over twenty years of experience working as a tech CTO and building cutting-edge SaaS solutions.

As the CEO of Full Scale, he has helped over 100 tech companies build their software services and development teams. Full Scale specializes in helping tech companies grow by augmenting their in-house teams with software development talent from the Philippines.

Matt hosts Startup Hustle, a top podcast about entrepreneurship with over 6 million downloads. He has a wealth of knowledge about startups and business from his personal experience and from interviewing hundreds of other entrepreneurs.