Last Updated on 2026-01-29
The $380,000 spreadsheet.
A CTO spent three weeks comparing India vs. Philippines offshore development options. He built elaborate spreadsheets. He compared salary ranges, talent pool sizes, and English proficiency rankings.
He chose India. Saved $120,000 annually on developer salaries. Great decision, right?
Twelve months later: four developers left. Replacement costs hit $180,000. Product launch delayed four months. Total damage: $380,000.
Saved $120K, lost $380K. Math checks out.
Here’s the problem. The India vs. Philippines offshore development debate isn’t wrong—it’s incomplete. Everyone’s comparing the wrong metrics. Most CTOs optimize for features when they should optimize for fit.
After watching 60+ tech companies make this India vs. Philippines offshore development choice, I’ve noticed a pattern. The ones spending weeks on salary charts usually fail. The ones who succeed ask one question: “Will my US team voluntarily grab coffee with these developers?“
This article won’t tell you which country to choose. It’ll give you the framework to know which one fits YOUR team. Let’s fix how you think about this decision.
What You'll Learn From This Guide
- ✓Why traditional comparison methods fail and lead to expensive mistakes
- ✓The Three Factors framework that actually predicts offshore success
- ✓Real retention data from 500+ developer placements over 7 years
- ✓When Philippines ISN'T the right choice (honest assessment included)
- ✓How to avoid the $380K mistake that killed the CTO's product timeline
Why Most India vs. Philippines Offshore Development Comparisons Fail
Most CTOs compare offshore development options like they’re shopping for laptops. Specs on a spreadsheet. Price per unit. Features checked off.
Here’s what they typically compare when evaluating India vs. Philippines offshore development:
- Hourly developer rates ($18-40/hr India, $15-35/hr Philippines)
- Talent pool size (5 million vs. 300,000 developers)
- English proficiency rankings
- Time zone differences
- Cost per developer
Sounds logical. It’s also exactly how 60% of offshore projects fail, regardless of whether you choose India vs. Philippines offshore development or any other destination.
I’ve watched this India offshore development challenges pattern repeat with 60+ companies. They optimize for the wrong metrics. They choose based on salary and headcount. Six months later, they’re rebuilding teams and missing product launches.
The real issue? You’re optimizing for features when you should optimize for outcomes. This flawed comparison method is why most offshore models fail, regardless of geography.
The Hidden Cost Nobody Calculates
Here’s what the spreadsheet doesn’t show when comparing Filipino developers vs. Indian developers. Replacing one developer costs 6-9 months of their salary in lost productivity, knowledge transfer, and recruitment overhead.
At 40% annual turnover (India’s average per LinkedIn’s 2024 Global Talent Trends report, you’re not building a team. You’re running a training program for someone else’s company.
The average cost to replace a technical employee exceeds $45,000 when factoring in recruiting, onboarding, and productivity ramp-up.
The Framework That Actually Works
Forget salary charts when making your India vs. Philippines offshore development choice. Three factors predict whether your offshore staff augmentation actually succeeds:
- Communication that doesn’t need translation – Do your US developers understand them on first pass?
- Cultural compatibility that reduces friction – Do they take initiative or wait for explicit direction?
- Retention that builds institutional knowledge – Will they remember why you made that architecture decision 18 months ago?
Everything else is noise.
The ones who succeed don’t spend weeks comparing India vs. Philippines offshore development salary charts. They ask one question: “Will my US team voluntarily grab coffee with these developers?” If yes, you’ve got 3+ years. If no, you’re counting months.
"The ones who succeed don't spend weeks comparing salary charts—they ask one question: 'Will my US team voluntarily grab coffee with these developers?' If yes, you've got 3+ years. If no, you're counting months."
India vs. Philippines for Offshore Development: Which Country Is Best for Offshore Software Development?
Quick Answer
The India vs. Philippines offshore development decision depends on one factor: Do you need the largest talent pool or the most integrated team? India offers 5 million developers with lower costs but 40% annual turnover. Philippines offers 300,000+ developers with 95% retention over 3+ years, neutral English accents, and natural cultural fit with US teams. For most scaling companies, long-term retention beats short-term cost savings.
Why Most Companies Get This Wrong
Here’s the math nobody shows you when comparing offshore development comparison options. Two developers leaving annually costs more than a higher hourly rate.
Scenario A (India-focused): Hire 10 developers at $30/hour. Lose 4 annually at 40% turnover. Replacement cost: $180,000/year plus 6-8 months of lost productivity per developer. Total hidden cost: $300K+ annually.
Scenario B (Philippines-focused): Hire 10 developers at $35/hour. Lose 0-1 annually at 5% turnover. Replacement cost: $45,000/year. Total hidden cost: $50K annually.
The “cheaper” India vs. Philippines offshore development option costs $250,000 more per year. That’s before calculating missed deadlines, lost domain knowledge, and product delays.
According to Stack Overflow’s 2024 Developer Survey (62,000 respondents), 67% of CTOs cite “knowledge continuity” as their primary concern with offshore teams—yet most still optimize for initial cost rather than offshore developer retention rates.
Here’s how to know which India vs. Philippines offshore development model fits YOUR situation. Keep reading.
The Three Factors That Actually Predict Offshore Development Success
Most offshore development comparison frameworks focus on surface metrics when evaluating India vs. Philippines offshore development. Bigger talent pools sound better. Lower rates seem smarter. Rankings feel scientific.
But after 500+ developer placements since 2017, we’ve identified what actually matters. Three factors predict whether your offshore team succeeds or becomes another failure statistic.
Key Statistics: India vs. Philippines Offshore Development
Let’s break down each factor that determines India vs. Philippines offshore development success with real data and client examples.
Factor #1: English Proficiency Offshore Developers—Communication That Works
English proficiency rankings measure test scores. They don’t measure Slack messages, standup participation, or whether your US tech lead needs to repeat requirements three times.
The Rankings vs. Reality:
According to the EF English Proficiency Index 2024, India ranks 60th globally, while the Philippines ranks 20th. But rankings don’t tell the whole story about communication among offshore teams.
The real question when comparing Filipino developers vs. Indian developers: When your US tech lead writes “Can you refactor this with composition over inheritance?”—do they understand what that means, why it matters, and what questions to ask?
Filipino developers vs. Indian developers differ in communication style:
- India: Strong technical skills, hierarchical communication style, less likely to say “I don’t understand.”
- Philippines: Strong technical skills, direct communication style, comfortable asking clarifying questions
Here’s what this looks like in practice for your India vs. Philippines offshore development choice.
Client Example: A SaaS startup tried India first for their India vs. Philippines offshore development needs. Every standup became a 45-minute clarification session. Developers would nod, say they understood, then build features that missed the mark.
They switched to the Philippines developers. Standups dropped to 15 minutes. Why? Philippines developers asked clarifying questions IN the standup rather than building the wrong thing silently.
The difference wasn’t English proficiency of offshore developers’ scores. It was a communication culture.
This visualization shows the stark difference in weekly time spent on requirement clarification based on our India vs. Philippines offshore development experience. Companies report spending 4-6 hours weekly clarifying requirements with India teams versus 30 minutes weekly with Philippines teams.
Communication offshore teams’ success comes down to shared technical culture. Filipino developers consume US tech content, participate in global developer communities using English as their primary language, and understand Silicon Valley work culture through platforms like GitHub, Stack Overflow, and dev.to.
That’s not better English. That’s shared context that eliminates translation layers—a critical factor in the India vs. Philippines offshore development decision.
Factor #2: Cultural Fit Offshore Development Teams Need
Time zones seem like a logistics problem when comparing India vs. Philippines offshore development. They’re actually a cultural fit offshore development problem.
Indian teams see the 12-hour difference as “we work while you sleep.” Philippines teams see it as “4 hours of overlap for decisions, 20 hours of flow time for shipping.”
One treats offshore as separate. One treats offshore as extended. That’s not geography—that’s mindset, a crucial consideration in your time zone offshore development strategy.
The Time Zone Reality for India vs. Philippines Offshore Development:
India Time Zone (IST): 10.5-13.5 hours ahead of US
- Overlap: Early morning US = Late evening India (limited)
- Standup timing: 3-4 AM India time for US morning standups
- Result: Async-heavy communication, delayed feedback loops
- Challenge: Different work days create 24-hour delays on decisions
Philippines Time Zone (PHT): 12-15 hours ahead of US
- Overlap: 8 PM-12 AM Philippines = 5 AM-9 AM US West / 8 AM-12 PM US East
- Standup timing: Comfortable evening hours (8-10 PM Philippines)
- Result: Real-time collaboration for critical decisions, async for deep work
- Advantage: Follow-the-sun productivity pattern
But time zone offshore development is just one piece of cultural compatibility in the India vs. Philippines offshore development comparison. Work culture matters more.
Work Culture Differences:
According to Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions research, India scores significantly higher on “power distance” (hierarchical structures), while the Philippines scores moderately, closer to Western work cultures.
What this means in practice for your India vs. Philippines offshore development choice:
- India: Developers wait for explicit task assignments, defer to authority, less comfortable challenging technical decisions
- Philippines: Developers take initiative, comfortable with respectful disagreement, proactive problem-solving
Client Example: Company Y’s India team waited for explicit assignments when evaluating India vs. Philippines offshore development options. Their Philippines team saw a bug in staging, fixed it, filed a PR—before anyone asked.
The difference? Filipino developers grew up with the US business culture. Their education follows the US system. Their work styles mirror Silicon Valley. That’s not a coincidence. That’s 100 years of shared business culture—a decisive factor in most India vs. Philippines offshore development comparisons.
A 2024 GitLab Remote Work Report found that 78% of offshore failures cite “cultural friction” as a primary factor when analyzing India vs. Philippines offshore development outcomes—yet 85% of CTOs rank it last in their selection criteria. They focus on salary. They miss the real cost driver.
Factor #3: Offshore Developer Retention Rates That Matter
Most CTOs budget for salary when comparing India vs. Philippines offshore development. They don’t budget for turnover.
Here’s the math nobody shows you in the India vs. Philippines offshore development comparison: Replacing one developer costs 6-9 months of their salary in lost productivity, knowledge transfer, and recruitment overhead.
The Retention Reality:
- India: 40% annual turnover (industry average per LinkedIn Global Talent Trends)
- Philippines: 95% retention over 3+ years Full Scale data from 500+ placements
Let’s calculate the real cost of the India vs. Philippines offshore development decision.
The Math Nobody Shows You in India vs. Philippines Offshore Development
India Team (10 developers):
- 4 developers leave annually (40% turnover)
- Replacement cost: $45K each = $180K/year
- Knowledge loss: 3-6 months per developer
- Onboarding drain: 20-30% productivity hit
- Project delays: $100K+ opportunity cost
True annual cost: $280K+
Philippines Team (10 developers):
- 0-1 developer leaves annually (5% turnover)
- Replacement cost: $45K = $45K/year
- Knowledge retention: Institutional memory intact
- Team momentum: Compounds over time
- Velocity gain: Architecture decisions preserved
True annual cost: $50K
India vs. Philippines Offshore Development Difference: $230,000 saved annually through retention alone
This calculation doesn't include velocity loss, morale impact, or the compounding effect of team stability over 3+ years
Why the Difference in India vs. Philippines Offshore Development Retention?
It’s not compensation. Offshore developer retention rates correlate with three factors:
- Career growth expectations: India’s job-hopping culture vs. the Philippines’ stability culture
- Model structure: Project outsourcing (transactional) vs. staff augmentation (relationship-based)
- Cultural alignment: Viewing role as “project work” vs. “team membership”
When developers feel like team members rather than contractors, they stay. Philippines developers integrate into your Slack channels, participate in retrospectives, and celebrate launches. That’s not geography in the India vs. Philippines offshore development equation. That’s how you structure the relationship.
Client Example: Company Z hired 8 Indian developers. Lost 3 in year one. Spent 6 months recruiting, training, and rebuilding team knowledge. Product launch delayed 4 months. Total cost: $285K (salaries + recruitment + opportunity cost).
They switched to our Philippines model. Same 8 developers, three years later. That stability let them ship 3x faster in year two. They’re not rebuilding institutional knowledge. They’re building on it.
The “expensive” Philippines team? Still shipping. Still building on last quarter’s work. Still remembering why you made that architecture decision 18 months ago.
"Each replacement costs 6-9 months salary in lost productivity plus recruiting overhead. At 40% annual turnover, you're not building a team—you're running a training program for someone else's company. The 'expensive' Philippines team? Still shipping, still building on last quarter's work, still remembering why you made that architecture decision 18 months ago."
According to Deloitte’s 2024 Global Outsourcing Survey, companies using strategic offshore partnerships with high retention achieved 35% better ROI than those optimizing purely for cost, primarily due to reduced replacement costs and maintained velocity. This makes the India vs. Philippines offshore development retention factor crucial.
India vs. Philippines Offshore Development: What Actually Matters
After analyzing the India vs. Philippines offshore development landscape, let’s see how both options compare. Notice what’s NOT on this table: generic pros and cons that could apply to any comparison. Every row connects to the three factors that predict offshore development success: communication, cultural fit, and retention.
| What Actually Matters | India | Philippines | Why This Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your developers will stay 3+ years | 60% probability 40% annual turnover |
95% probability 5% turnover |
Each replacement costs 6-9 months salary in lost productivity + recruiting overhead. This is the #1 factor in india vs. philippines offshore development ROI |
| Your team won't need "translators" | Moderate accent, hierarchical communication, ranked 60th globally | Neutral accent, direct communication, ranked 20th globally | Saves 4-6 hrs/week in clarification meetings and rework from misunderstood requirements (250+ hours annually per developer) |
| They'll work during your afternoon | IST: 3-4 AM India time for US standups = Limited overlap, graveyard shifts | PHT: 8 PM-12 AM Philippines time = 4-hour overlap with US West Coast | Real-time collaboration for critical decisions, async for deep work. Time zone offshore development strategy matters for velocity |
| They'll challenge your assumptions | Cultural tendency to defer to authority, hierarchical work style | Cultural comfort with respectful disagreement, collaborative work style | Catches bugs before production, improves architecture, prevents building wrong thing. Key cultural fit offshore development factor |
| They'll integrate with your culture | Requires intentional cultural bridge-building, distinct business norms | Natural alignment with Western work culture, 100+ years US business influence | US team voluntarily includes them in virtual coffee chats and social channels. Reduces "us vs. them" mentality |
| English proficiency (EF EPI 2024) | Ranked 60th globally Moderate Proficiency |
Ranked 20th globally High Proficiency |
Neutral accent = first-pass comprehension = faster velocity. Critical for communication offshore teams |
| Hourly rate range | $18-40/hour Junior to Senior |
$15-35/hour Junior to Senior |
Similar hourly cost, but Philippines offers better total 3-year ROI when retention calculated ($230K savings per 10 devs) |
| Talent pool size | ~5 million developers Massive scale |
~300,000 developers Smaller but quality-focused |
India wins for 100+ developers quickly. Philippines' smaller pool = easier to identify top performers, less noise |
| Tech education & expertise | Strong STEM programs, global universities, IIT system, diverse specializations | Strong STEM programs, US-aligned curriculum, 40,000+ IT graduates yearly | Both produce skilled developers. Philippines graduates speak English as primary technical language from day one |
| Government & infrastructure support | Established IT hubs (Bangalore, Hyderabad), mature infrastructure | $1.2B government investment in IT infrastructure, PEZA incentives | Both offer stable infrastructure. Philippines actively cultivates tech sector growth through policy |
India wins on scale and established reputation. Philippines wins on communication clarity, cultural integration, long-term retention, and team stability. Which matters more for YOUR situation? That depends on your answer to one question: Are you building a team or filling project slots?
This India vs. Philippines offshore development comparison reveals a clear pattern. If you need 100+ developers in three months, India’s scale wins. If you need 10-20 developers who’ll stay for three years, the Philippines’ integration wins.
Before you make your India vs. Philippines offshore development decision, there’s one more factor most CTOs miss: knowing when Philippines (or any offshore model) ISN’T right for you.
3 Situations Where You Should Choose India (Or Skip Offshore Entirely)
Look, I run a Philippines-based company focused on the India vs. Philippines offshore development market. Obviously, I think it’s the best model for most teams. But “most” isn’t “all.”
If you’re not ready to integrate offshore developers like real team members, or you need 200 developers by next quarter, the Philippines isn’t your answer in the India vs. Philippines offshore development comparison. I’d rather tell you that now than take your money and watch you fail.
Here are three specific situations where you should choose differently in your India vs. Philippines offshore development evaluation:
Situation #1: You Need 100+ Developers Immediately
If you need to scale to 100+ developers in 3 months, India’s larger talent pool is the right choice in the India vs. Philippines offshore development decision. The Philippines can’t match that speed at that scale.
The Philippines developer market has 300,000 professionals versus India’s 5 million. For massive, rapid scaling, that numerical advantage matters in the India vs. Philippines offshore development equation. You’ll sacrifice retention and cultural fit, but you’ll hit your headcount target.
However, if you’re scaling to 10-20 developers over 6-12 months, the Philippines offers better long-term stability. The question is speed versus sustainability when weighing India vs. Philippines offshore development options.
Situation #2: You’re Optimizing Purely for Lowest Cost
If your primary goal is the lowest possible hourly rate and you’re willing to accept higher turnover in your India vs. Philippines offshore development analysis, India’s bottom-tier pricing can go slightly lower.
You can find Indian developers at $18-25/hour versus Filipinos $20-30/hour. That $5/hour difference adds up across large teams. But remember: lowest cost ≠ best value in India vs. Philippines offshore development ROI.
Factor in turnover costs before deciding on your India vs. Philippines offshore development choice. That $5/hour savings disappears after losing 2-3 developers annually. But if your CFO only looks at hourly rates, India can show lower initial numbers.
Situation #3: You Already Have Working India Relationships
If you’ve successfully navigated India offshore and have a stable team, don’t switch just because the Philippines ranks higher on some metrics in India vs. Philippines offshore development comparisons.
Team stability and established relationships matter more than marginal improvements. Your India team knows your codebase, understands your product, and works well with your US team. That’s valuable, regardless of theoretical India vs. Philippines offshore development advantages.
However, if you’re experiencing high turnover or communication issues, it’s worth exploring alternatives through a fresh India vs. Philippines offshore development evaluation. A working relationship beats theoretical advantages every time.
We turn away 40% of companies that contact Full Scale because offshore isn’t right for their situation, or they’re not ready for the Direct Integration Model. This isn’t about selling you Philippines developers in the India vs. Philippines offshore development debate. It’s about helping you make the right choice for your specific context.
Why We Bet Our Entire Business on the Philippines for Offshore Development
When I started Full Scale in 2017, everyone said I was crazy to focus exclusively on the Philippines in the India vs. Philippines offshore development market. India was the proven market. Eastern Europe was emerging. Why limit ourselves?
Here’s why. I’d spent 20 years building development teams. I knew the difference between developers who “do the work” and developers who “own the outcome.” I needed the latter for our India vs. Philippines offshore development solution.
The Philippines was the only place where we consistently found developers who thought like product engineers, not task completers. They didn’t wait for tickets. They saw problems and solved them. They challenged assumptions respectfully. They celebrated launches like they were theirs.
Seven years and 500+ placements later, our 95% retention rate over three years proves this wasn’t a bet in the India vs. Philippines offshore development landscape. It was a framework.
The Full Scale Model: Staff Augmentation, Not Project Outsourcing
We receive 1,000+ applications monthly from Filipino developers. We accept 3%.
Our vetting process tests for technical skill AND cultural fit. We reject excellent coders who can’t communicate. We reject great communicators who can’t code. Both matter equally in successful India vs. Philippines offshore development outcomes.
We don’t do project outsourcing. We do staff augmentation—your team, our payroll.
Here’s the difference in the India vs. Philippines offshore development model:
Project Outsourcing (What most companies do):
- Hand off project specs to the offshore team
- The project manager acts as a middleman
- Team works separately, delivers at milestones
- Transactional relationship
- Result: 40% turnover, communication gaps, “vendor” mentality
Staff Augmentation (Full Scale model):
- Developers join YOUR Slack, standups, retrospectives
- No middlemen between you and developers
- Teamwork works integrated, ships continuously
- Partnership relationship
- Result: 95% retention, seamless integration, “teammate” mentality
According to Full Scale’s pricing structure, developers cost $2,000-$5,000 monthly depending on seniority and specialization, with month-to-month flexibility and zero long-term lock-in. You’re never trapped.
Client Proof: From 2 to 12 Developers in 8 Weeks
A SaaS platform needed to scale from 2 to 12 developers in 6 months for their India vs. Philippines offshore development expansion. Local hiring would take 18+ months and cost $2.1M in salaries alone.
We placed 10 senior developers in 8 weeks for $900K annually. Eighteen months later, 9 of those 10 developers are still on the team. They’ve shipped 4 major releases and maintain 99.9% uptime.
That’s not an India vs. Philippines offshore development comparison. That’s what happens when retention and integration are built into the model from day one.
Why Partner With Full Scale for Your India vs. Philippines Offshore Development Needs?
Why Choose Full Scale
Access 1,000+ developers vetted to top 3%
From kickoff call to developer in your codebase
Month-to-month contracts, no lock-in
Onboarding playbooks proven across 60+ companies
Developers stay an average of 3+ years
IP protection and legal clarity
We test for both, reject candidates who lack either
$2,000-$5,000/month based on seniority, no hidden fees
Want to see if the Direct Integration Model fits your team? We’ll spend 30 minutes understanding your situation and tell you honestly whether Philippines offshore is right for you—even if that answer is “not yet.”
30-minute consultation • No pressure • Honest assessment
The Decision: Framework Over Features
The India vs. Philippines offshore development decision isn’t about salary charts or talent pool size. It’s about three factors that predict whether offshore actually works:
- Communication that doesn’t need translation
- Cultural compatibility that reduces friction
- Retention that builds institutional knowledge
The Philippines wins on all three for most Western companies in the India vs. Philippines offshore development evaluation. India wins on scale and established reputation.
But here’s what matters more than country in the India vs. Philippines offshore development comparison: Are you ready to treat offshore developers like teammates or vendors?
If you’re looking for “cheap resources” to hand tasks to, neither India nor the Philippines will work long-term in your India vs. Philippines offshore development strategy. Offshore fails when treated as outsourcing.
If you’re looking for integrated team members who happen to be in a different time zone, the Philippines offers the clearest path to success based on our India vs. Philippines offshore development experience. That’s not bias. That’s 500+ placements and 95% retention talking.
"That's 500+ placements and 95% retention talking. Philippines wins on all three factors for most Western companies: communication that doesn't need translation, cultural compatibility that reduces friction, and retention that builds institutional knowledge."
Build your world-class team.
The Philippines and India have similar hourly rates ($15-35/hr Philippines, $18-40/hr India), but the total cost of ownership differs significantly when making the India vs. Philippines offshore development comparison. The Philippines’ 95% retention rate versus India’s 40% annual turnover means lower replacement costs, faster velocity, and better ROI. When you factor in 6-9 months’ salary per replacement, the Philippines typically costs 30-40% less over 3 years despite similar hourly rates. Check our offshore development cost breakdown for detailed calculations on the India vs. Philippines offshore development ROI.
Both countries produce skilled developers from strong STEM programs in the India vs. Philippines offshore development comparison. The difference isn’t technical capability—it’s communication and integration. Filipino developers attend US-curriculum universities, consume US tech content, and participate in global developer communities using English as their primary technical language. Both can build complex systems; Filipino developers integrate more smoothly with Western teams. Our vetting process ensures technical excellence regardless of geography in the India vs. Philippines offshore development selection.
The Philippines is 12 hours ahead of the US East Coast (15 hours ahead of the West Coast). This provides a 4-hour overlap with West Coast mornings (8 PM-12 AM Philippines time) for real-time collaboration on critical decisions in your India vs. Philippines offshore development operation. The remaining 20 hours allow uninterrupted deep work. Many teams use this for follow-the-sun productivity: the US team hands off at 5 PM, the Philippines team delivers updates by the US morning. Learn more about managing distributed teams effectively in the time zone offshore development strategy.
Most offshore failures stem from the model, not the location in the India vs. Philippines offshore development analysis. Project outsourcing (common with India) creates a vendor-client dynamic. Staff augmentation (our Philippines model) creates a teammate dynamic. If your last offshore experience felt like managing contractors, you were using the wrong model. Philippines developers excel in direct integration because they’re hired as team extensions, not project deliverables. Our Direct Integration Model addresses the root causes of offshore failure regardless of the India vs. Philippines offshore development location.
Yes. Most successful partnerships start with 1-3 developers for 3-6 months to test the India vs. Philippines offshore development fit. This lets you test integration, communication, and cultural fit before scaling. At Full Scale, we recommend starting with senior-level developers who can integrate quickly and set the foundation for team growth. Month-to-month contracts mean zero long-term risk in your India vs. Philippines offshore development trial. See our hiring process for how we match developers to your needs.
Matt Watson is a serial tech entrepreneur who has started four companies and had a nine-figure exit. He was the founder and CTO of VinSolutions, the #1 CRM software used in today’s automotive industry. He has over twenty years of experience working as a tech CTO and building cutting-edge SaaS solutions.
As the CEO of Full Scale, he has helped over 100 tech companies build their software services and development teams. Full Scale specializes in helping tech companies grow by augmenting their in-house teams with software development talent from the Philippines.
Matt hosts Startup Hustle, a top podcast about entrepreneurship with over 6 million downloads. He has a wealth of knowledge about startups and business from his personal experience and from interviewing hundreds of other entrepreneurs.
